On 14/10/2016 15:33, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 06:24:44PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> We have now the cpu_exec_realize() in realize,
>> so the init part must be in init.
>> I've removed the cannot_destroy_with_object_finalize_yet field as
>> unsafe references have been moved to cpu_exec_realize().
>> (tested with QOM command provided by commit 4c315c27 with
>> "athlon-x86_64-cpu")
>> CC: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lviv...@redhat.com>
> Resending the question I asked in my reply to v1:
> Instead of creating requiring each subclass to manually call
> cpu_exec_init()) on instance_init, why don't we move parts of
> cpu_exec_init()/cpu_exec_realize() code to cpu_common_initfn()?
> (TYPE_CPU's instance_init)
> (And if there's any code that needs to be run after the
> subclasses instance_init functions, we can just add a
> instance_post_init function to TYPE_CPU).

It's done in PATCH 20/20.

Is that what you want?


Reply via email to