On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 11:24:10 +0800 Dou Liyang <douly.f...@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> As QEMU supports the memory-less node, it is possible that there is > no RAM in the first numa node(also be called as node0). eg: > ... \ > -m 128,slots=3,maxmem=1G \ > -numa node -numa node,mem=128M \ > > But, this makes it hard for QEMU to build a known-to-work ACPI SRAT > table. Only fixing it is not enough. > > Add a testcase for this situation to make sure the ACPI table is > correct for guest. > > Suggested-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.f...@cn.fujitsu.com> > --- > tests/acpi-test-data/pc/DSDT.numamem | Bin 0 -> 6463 bytes > tests/acpi-test-data/pc/SLIT.numamem | Bin 0 -> 48 bytes > tests/acpi-test-data/pc/SRAT.numamem | Bin 0 -> 264 bytes > tests/acpi-test-data/q35/DSDT.numamem | Bin 0 -> 9147 bytes > tests/acpi-test-data/q35/SLIT.numamem | Bin 0 -> 48 bytes > tests/acpi-test-data/q35/SRAT.numamem | Bin 0 -> 264 bytes > tests/bios-tables-test.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 7 files changed, 30 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 tests/acpi-test-data/pc/DSDT.numamem > create mode 100644 tests/acpi-test-data/pc/SLIT.numamem > create mode 100644 tests/acpi-test-data/pc/SRAT.numamem > create mode 100644 tests/acpi-test-data/q35/DSDT.numamem > create mode 100644 tests/acpi-test-data/q35/SLIT.numamem > create mode 100644 tests/acpi-test-data/q35/SRAT.numamem considering only SRAT table has been changed and the other tables match with default blobs, I'd suggest to keep only tests/acpi-test-data/[pc|q35]/SRAT.numamem in this patch and drop the rest of *.numamem tables as test case should fallback to default tables when .numamem variant doesn't exists
