Hi Igor,
At 08/23/2017 04:40 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 11:24:10 +0800
Dou Liyang <douly.f...@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
As QEMU supports the memory-less node, it is possible that there is
no RAM in the first numa node(also be called as node0). eg:
... \
-m 128,slots=3,maxmem=1G \
-numa node -numa node,mem=128M \
But, this makes it hard for QEMU to build a known-to-work ACPI SRAT
table. Only fixing it is not enough.
Add a testcase for this situation to make sure the ACPI table is
correct for guest.
Suggested-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
tests/acpi-test-data/pc/DSDT.numamem | Bin 0 -> 6463 bytes
tests/acpi-test-data/pc/SLIT.numamem | Bin 0 -> 48 bytes
tests/acpi-test-data/pc/SRAT.numamem | Bin 0 -> 264 bytes
tests/acpi-test-data/q35/DSDT.numamem | Bin 0 -> 9147 bytes
tests/acpi-test-data/q35/SLIT.numamem | Bin 0 -> 48 bytes
tests/acpi-test-data/q35/SRAT.numamem | Bin 0 -> 264 bytes
tests/bios-tables-test.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
7 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tests/acpi-test-data/pc/DSDT.numamem
create mode 100644 tests/acpi-test-data/pc/SLIT.numamem
create mode 100644 tests/acpi-test-data/pc/SRAT.numamem
create mode 100644 tests/acpi-test-data/q35/DSDT.numamem
create mode 100644 tests/acpi-test-data/q35/SLIT.numamem
create mode 100644 tests/acpi-test-data/q35/SRAT.numamem
considering only SRAT table has been changed and the other
tables match with default blobs, I'd suggest to keep only
Our testcase is：
+ test_acpi_one(" -m 128,slots=3,maxmem=1G"
+ " -numa node -numa node,mem=128"
+ " -numa dist,src=0,dst=1,val=21",
+ &data);
The DSDT and SLIT don't match with default blobs.
So, they can't be dropped.
Thanks,
dou.
tests/acpi-test-data/[pc|q35]/SRAT.numamem
in this patch and drop the rest of *.numamem tables
as test case should fallback to default tables
when .numamem variant doesn't exists
