On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 11:18:43AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 05/03/2018 09:42, Liu, Yi L wrote:
> >> In general I think it's better to change your names from "assigned_dev"
> >> to "sva_dev", because the point of the list is to only iterate over
> >> devices that might be interested in using SVA.
> >
> > For "assigned_dev", my purpose is to distinguish "assigned devices" from
> > emulated devices. Only the SVA usage on "assigned devices" is cared here.
> > But it is true only SVA capable device is interested. So I may need to
> > rename it as "assigned_sva_dev". How about your opinion?
> What you care about is not whether the device assigned, but rather
> whether it called or not pci_setup_sva_ops.  Currently only VFIO does
> this, but that's not a requirement.  Hence my suggestion of calling it
> sva_dev.

Yes, only VFIO calls pci_setup_sva_ops so far, but it should not limited to.
I'll apply in next version.

Yi Liu

Reply via email to