On Sun, 15 Apr 2018 15:07:19 -0400 Tony Krowiak <akrow...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> default-configs/s390x-softmmu.mak | 1 + > docs/vfio-ap.txt | 649 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > hw/s390x/Makefile.objs | 1 + > hw/s390x/ap-device.c | 39 +++ > hw/vfio/Makefile.objs | 1 + > hw/vfio/ap.c | 191 +++++++++++ > include/hw/s390x/ap-device.h | 38 +++ > include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h | 1 + > linux-headers/asm-s390/kvm.h | 2 + > linux-headers/linux/vfio.h | 2 + > target/s390x/cpu_features.c | 3 + > target/s390x/cpu_features_def.h | 3 + > target/s390x/cpu_models.c | 2 + > target/s390x/gen-features.c | 3 + > target/s390x/kvm.c | 1 + > ui/keycodemapdb | 2 +- > 16 files changed, 938 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 docs/vfio-ap.txt > create mode 100644 hw/s390x/ap-device.c > create mode 100644 hw/vfio/ap.c > create mode 100644 include/hw/s390x/ap-device.h Can we please get a MAINTAINERS entry for ap? While I'm obviously happy to take things through the s390x tree, ap is not something I can easily review (or even test), so I'd like to see an entry with dedicated (IBM) maintainers. Also, hw/vfio/ap.c and docs/vfio-ap.c should be added to the generic s390 section.
