On 04/19/2018 07:51 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Sun, 15 Apr 2018 15:07:19 -0400
Tony Krowiak <akrow...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
default-configs/s390x-softmmu.mak | 1 +
docs/vfio-ap.txt | 649 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
hw/s390x/Makefile.objs | 1 +
hw/s390x/ap-device.c | 39 +++
hw/vfio/Makefile.objs | 1 +
hw/vfio/ap.c | 191 +++++++++++
include/hw/s390x/ap-device.h | 38 +++
include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h | 1 +
linux-headers/asm-s390/kvm.h | 2 +
linux-headers/linux/vfio.h | 2 +
target/s390x/cpu_features.c | 3 +
target/s390x/cpu_features_def.h | 3 +
target/s390x/cpu_models.c | 2 +
target/s390x/gen-features.c | 3 +
target/s390x/kvm.c | 1 +
ui/keycodemapdb | 2 +-
16 files changed, 938 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 docs/vfio-ap.txt
create mode 100644 hw/s390x/ap-device.c
create mode 100644 hw/vfio/ap.c
create mode 100644 include/hw/s390x/ap-device.h
Can we please get a MAINTAINERS entry for ap? While I'm obviously happy
to take things through the s390x tree, ap is not something I can easily
review (or even test), so I'd like to see an entry with dedicated (IBM)
maintainers.
Will do .... who would you like to see in this list?
Also, hw/vfio/ap.c and docs/vfio-ap.c should be added to the generic
s390 section.
Okay.
