Le 09/09/2019 à 18:32, Aleksandar Markovic a écrit : > > 09.09.2019. 18.03, "Laurent Vivier" <laur...@vivier.eu > <mailto:laur...@vivier.eu>> је написао/ла: >> >> Co-developed-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayl...@ilande.co.uk > <mailto:mark.cave-ayl...@ilande.co.uk>> >> Signed-off-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayl...@ilande.co.uk > <mailto:mark.cave-ayl...@ilande.co.uk>> >> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laur...@vivier.eu > <mailto:laur...@vivier.eu>> >> Reviewed-by: Hervé Poussineau <hpous...@reactos.org > <mailto:hpous...@reactos.org>> >> --- > > Laurent, hi! > > I am not sure how "Co-developed-by:" fits in our workflow. There was > some recent talk on restricting those marks to only a handful of them, > and preventing new ones from introducing (the starter example was > something like "Regression-tested-by:"). Perhaps a final sentence "This > patch was co-developed with Mark..." would be better? >
"Co-developed-by:" is described in linux/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst [1] whereas "Regression-tested-by:" is not. So as I'm not aware of the discussions you point out, are we in the same situation here? Thanks, Laurent [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.17/process/submitting-patches.html
