On 20/12/19 14:32, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 9:20 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
> <phi...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> After this chat on #qemu IRC:
>> 13:20 <stsquad> so what is the difference between a IOReadHandler and 
>> IOEventHandler?
>> 13:25 <f4bug> stsquad: one is in-band and the other out-of-band?
>> 13:26 <stsquad> f4bug: ahh yes it seems so - connect/disconnect etc...
>> 13:27 <f4bug> see QEMUChrEvent for IOEventHandler
>>
>> I thought it might be a good opportunity to make the IOEventHandler
>> typedef meaning more obvious, by using the QEMUChrEvent enum.
>>
>> To be able to build I had to explicit all enums ignored in the
>> switch(event) statement by these frontends.
>>
>> Then I used a coccinelle spatch to change the various IOEventHandler.
>> I don't think the last patch can be split, but suggestions are welcome!
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Phil.
>>
>> v2:
>> - do blindly ignore all events using a 'default' case.
>>
>> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (14):
>>   hw/ipmi: Remove unnecessary declarations
>>   hw/ipmi: Explicit we ignore some QEMUChrEvent in IOEventHandler
>>   hw/char/terminal3270: Explicit ignored QEMUChrEvent in IOEventHandler
>>   hw/usb/dev-serial: Explicit we ignore few QEMUChrEvent in IOEventHandler
>>   hw/usb/redirect: Explicit we ignore few QEMUChrEvent in IOEventHandler
>>   ccid-card-passthru: Explicit we ignore QEMUChrEvent in IOEventHandler
>>   vhost-user-crypto: Explicit we ignore some QEMUChrEvent in IOEventHandler
>>   vhost-user-net: Explicit we ignore few QEMUChrEvent in IOEventHandler
>>   vhost-user-blk: Explicit we ignore few QEMUChrEvent in IOEventHandler
>>   virtio-console: Explicit we ignore some QEMUChrEvent in IOEventHandler
>>   monitor/qmp: Explicit we ignore few QEMUChrEvent in IOEventHandler
>>   monitor/hmp: Explicit we ignore a QEMUChrEvent in IOEventHandler
>>   chardev/char: Explicit we ignore some QEMUChrEvent in IOEventHandler
>>   chardev: Use QEMUChrEvent enum in IOEventHandler typedef
> 
> Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com>
> 
> (I guess Paolo will take the series for next PR?)

Yes, I'm queuing it.  I'll check Richard's remark before sending out the
pull request.

Paolo


Reply via email to