* Daniel P. Berrangé: > and supported by GCC, CLang, GLibC and more.
Clang and glibc are the official spellings, I think. > diff --git a/docs/system/cpu-models-x86-abi.csv > b/docs/system/cpu-models-x86-abi.csv > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000000..4565e6a535 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/docs/system/cpu-models-x86-abi.csv > +Icelake-Client,✅,✅,✅, > +Icelake-Client-noTSX,✅,✅,✅, > +Icelake-Client-v1,✅,✅,✅, > +Icelake-Client-v2,✅,✅,✅, Icelake Client supports x86-64-v4 according to Intel ARK and a quick test on a reference system. Have you defined it differently in QEMU? > +KnightsMill,✅,✅,✅, > +KnightsMill-v1,✅,✅,✅, This one is correct. Even though Knights Mill supports AVX-512, it does not cover the variants that are considered definitive for x86-64-v4. > +Skylake-Server,✅,✅,✅,✅ > +Skylake-Server-IBRS,✅,✅,✅,✅ > +Skylake-Server-noTSX-IBRS,✅,✅,✅,✅ > +Skylake-Server-v1,✅,✅,✅,✅ > +Skylake-Server-v2,✅,✅,✅,✅ > +Skylake-Server-v3,✅,✅,✅,✅ > +Skylake-Server-v4,✅,✅,✅,✅ This one is a little bit odd. Skylake Xeons which are not Xeon Scalable Processors exist, and they do not support x86-64-v4. Is this again a matter of different naming in QEMU? Thanks, Florian -- Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill
