Brian Cain <bc...@quicinc.com> writes:
>> -----Original Message----- >> From: Brian Cain >> Sent: Friday, October 1, 2021 7:23 PM >> To: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>; Alex Bennée >> <alex.ben...@linaro.org>; qemu-devel@nongnu.org >> Cc: Taylor Simpson <tsimp...@quicinc.com> >> Subject: RE: hexagon container update >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Brian Cain >> ... >> > > -----Original Message----- >> > > From: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org> >> > ... >> > > On 10/1/21 12:59 PM, Brian Cain wrote: >> > > > Alex, >> > > > >> > > > We need to update the docker container used for hexagon for new test >> > cases >> > > proposed in Taylor's recent patch series under review. Thankfully, >> > CodeLinaro >> > > has provided a binary of the hexagon cross toolchain so now I think we >> > > can >> > > simplify the hexagon docker file to something like the below. I hope >> > > this >> also >> > > means that we can remove the exceptional handling for the hexagon >> > container. > > We had some issues with the previous attempt to update the container. > The linux-user "signals" test failed. Richard pointed out that the > archive of the C library had what looks like a defect that would cause > the test to fail. > > https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg849635.html > > I'm following up now with a workaround - the attached patch references > a toolchain which avoids the problem and passes the signals test. This > toolchain is based on llvm+clang 13.0.1-rc2. BTW, the release page has > a signature provided in case anyone wants to verify the download: > https://github.com/quic/toolchain_for_hexagon/releases/tag/13.0.1-rc2_ > > Can we try again with this new container definition? > > -Brian > > [2. 0001-Update-Hexagon-toolchain-to-13.0.1-rc2.patch --- text/x-diff; > 0001-Update-Hexagon-toolchain-to-13.0.1-rc2.patch]... Could you send the updated patch against the current master in the usual way please? That way I know it's been tested and there is less risk of me botching up a franken patch by applying to the wrong base. -- Alex Bennée
