Am 14.12.2011 22:08, schrieb Anthony Liguori: > On 12/14/2011 02:54 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Anthony >> Liguori<aligu...@us.ibm.com>wrote: >> >>> For v2, I'm relying on a fork of gtk-doc that removes the underscore >>> requirements. I really hate to do this but I like it better than not >>> having >>> documentation. I'm poking in the gtk+ community to see if there's an >>> upstream >>> compromise possible. >> >> Can you point out a discussion/bug, What is the "undersco[r]e >> requirements"? > > The following is what I need to make it work. I'm still trying to find > out where to even have this discussion.
Their website has the following: "GTK-Doc wasn't originally intended to be a general-purpose documentation tool, so it can be a bit awkward to setup and use. For a more polished general-purpose documentation tool you may want to look at Doxygen. However GTK-Doc has some special code to document the signals and properties of GTK+ widgets and GObject classes which other tools may not have." http://www.gtk.org/gtk-doc/ Don't know if Doxygen has less restrictions though. Andreas -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
