Am 15.12.2011 10:32, schrieb Stefan Weil: > Am 15.12.2011 06:22, schrieb Andreas Färber: >> Their website has the following: >> >> "GTK-Doc wasn't originally intended to be a general-purpose >> documentation tool, so it can be a bit awkward to setup and use. For a >> more polished general-purpose documentation tool you may want to look at >> Doxygen. However GTK-Doc has some special code to document the signals >> and properties of GTK+ widgets and GObject classes which other tools may >> not have." >> http://www.gtk.org/gtk-doc/ >> >> Don't know if Doxygen has less restrictions though. >> >> Andreas > > With doxygen, the documentation looks like this: > http://qemu.weilnetz.de/doxygen/ > > I only modified the first lines of memory.h to get > the global C functions, but of course more changes > are needed if we choose doxygen as our standard.
You seem to have included Anthony's patches (specifically the one to split out nested structs). Is Doxygen really as broken as gtk-doc seems to be or can we do without it? Kevin
