Ani Sinha <a...@anisinha.ca> writes:
<snip> > > We have added a mirror of biosbits to the QEMU project so there is no > reason why we can't track changes and modifications there (we do this > for TestFloat which is forked from the upstream SoftFloat code). > > The whole idea was that say an acpi developer added support for a new table > in QEMU, he should write a corresponding > test for bits so that the same table is exercised during run time. Making > those changes from a single repo (either directly > or through a submodule) makes things lit simpler and also keeps things in > sync with each other. If we use separate > repos for acpi bits test, it will be another mess when comes to developers > adding changes and keeping things in sync. > > Anyways these things should have been brought up earlier. I'm out of the > debate. > > I've sent v7 , incremental work over the last 6 months in my spare time > without getting any pay. So take it or scrap it. > > 😊 I'm sorry you feel that way but you asked for people to spend their time reviewing your code and giving feedback. If you don't have time to take it forward then fine but I'm afraid a "take it or leave it" attitude will just result in it not getting merged. Hopefully someone else who has the time to look into it will be able to pick it up later. -- Alex Bennée
