On Fri Nov 4, 2022 at 10:53 AM CET, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > Splitting this big patch would ease review:
It's only +165/-131, are you sure it really needs to be split? > 1/ Replace safe_execve() by safe_execveat() > > -safe_execve(exec_path, argp, envp)) > +safe_execveat(AT_FDCWD, exec_path, argp, envp, 0)); > > 2/ Extract do_execve() > > 3/ Convert do_execve() to do_execveat() adding dirfd/flags args > > 4/ Add TARGET_NR_execveat case
