Le 04/11/2022 à 10:55, Drew DeVault a écrit :
On Fri Nov 4, 2022 at 10:53 AM CET, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Splitting this big patch would ease review:
It's only +165/-131, are you sure it really needs to be split?
1/ Replace safe_execve() by safe_execveat()
-safe_execve(exec_path, argp, envp))
+safe_execveat(AT_FDCWD, exec_path, argp, envp, 0));
2/ Extract do_execve()
3/ Convert do_execve() to do_execveat() adding dirfd/flags args
4/ Add TARGET_NR_execveat case
I think it's not needed, it's mainly a code move and it's easy to compare.
Thanks,
Laurent
