----- Mensaje original ----- > On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 01:49:22PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > > This allows a Spice client to identify a VM > > My only problem with this is that if we have a monitor vmcchannel you > could issue the command to query that, and much more, without having > to > add any messages. And adding a monitor channel is really easy - the > only > requirement being that qemu can handle two monitor users, libvirt and > spice.
Interesting idea, then we would have a Spice "qemu monitor" channel, and we would need to do the same job as libvirt-qemu to have a stable layer on top. Arguably, we could share their code, but that doesn't seem trivial either. Both approach do not seem incompatible to me.Having a uuid/name Spice API can be useful for XSpice or other servers too.
