On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 11:15:48AM -0500, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > > > ----- Mensaje original ----- > > On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 01:49:22PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > > > This allows a Spice client to identify a VM > > > > My only problem with this is that if we have a monitor vmcchannel you > > could issue the command to query that, and much more, without having > > to > > add any messages. And adding a monitor channel is really easy - the > > only > > requirement being that qemu can handle two monitor users, libvirt and > > spice. > > Interesting idea, then we would have a Spice "qemu monitor" channel, > and we would need to do the same job as libvirt-qemu to have a stable > layer on top. Arguably, we could share their code, but that doesn't seem > trivial either.
True. It would be simpler if there was a libqemumonitor inside qemu that libvirt and us used. > > Both approach do not seem incompatible to me.Having a uuid/name Spice API > can be useful for XSpice or other servers too. True. Then it makes sense to add this.
