On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Paolo Cavallini <cavall...@faunalia.it> wrote: > > Thanks Alex. One first thing we have to decide is whether to participate > within the OSGeo framework. This seems a natural choice, but there are > possible shortcomings: > - it is possible that we'll have more chances (an higher number of accepted > projects) running alone, due to Google priorities
I think that QGIS would not be accepted alone (it already got rejected few years ago). Also participating with OSGeo offloads some program administration work. > - less motivation by mentors (they do not receive any financial incentive, > that goes to OSGeo instead). I hope that is something that can still be discussed within OSGeo. I would be much happier if destination of most of the money would go to participating project - e.g. 20% for OSGeo and the rest for QGIS sounds like a sensible choice. Martin _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
