> Hi Pirming, > thanks for raising the issue. I'd be a bit careful about autoclosing. Tickets > are a > huge source of knowledge about the program, often are opened as placeholder > not to > forget missing function that we'll deal with, sooner or later, etc. > Besides that, users will sometimes take this as impolite, or think that we > are trying > to hide problems, and refrain from getting involved with the project. > Me and Giovanni Manghi have dealt with (and opened[0]) many hundreds of > tickets, and > I think nothing can replace careful consideration. > Having said that, I agree that if a ticket has no feedback for weeks, and is > probably > a local issue, is better be closed. > Please do some careful simulation, checking the likely results, before acting. > This is by no means a secondary issue, as it involves our public image, and > the > relations with our community
I agree with Paolo, please do not close tickets automatically... yet. Let me work on the queue during the HF, I'm sure that many features requests tickets can be closed. I know well the bug queue and I'm not so sure that there are many tickets that can be closed, most of them are real issue. Eventually I can make a report and we can discuss what to do. cheers -- G -- _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
