Giovanni, René-Luc, Am Montag, 9. September 2013, 14.15:50 schrieb Giovanni Manghi: > > Hi Pirming, > > thanks for raising the issue. I'd be a bit careful about autoclosing. > > Tickets are a huge source of knowledge about the program, often are > > opened as placeholder not to forget missing function that we'll deal > > with, sooner or later, etc. Besides that, users will sometimes take this > > as impolite, or think that we are trying to hide problems, and refrain > > from getting involved with the project. Me and Giovanni Manghi have dealt > > with (and opened[0]) many hundreds of tickets, and I think nothing can > > replace careful consideration. > > Having said that, I agree that if a ticket has no feedback for weeks, and > > is probably a local issue, is better be closed. > > Please do some careful simulation, checking the likely results, before > > acting. This is by no means a secondary issue, as it involves our public > > image, and the relations with our community > > I agree with Paolo, > > please do not close tickets automatically... yet. > > > Let me work on the queue during the HF, I'm sure that many features > requests tickets can be closed.
You can decide during the HF, whether I should run a script once for closing tickets. It's possible to limit the affected tickets e.g. by version or assignement. I also recommend setting the target version of open 2.0 tickets to "Version X - Unplanned" unless you know, that someone will work on it. Pirmin > > I know well the bug queue and I'm not so sure that there are many > tickets that can be closed, most of them are real issue. Eventually I > can make a report and we can discuss what to do. > > cheers > > -- G -- > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
