Hi, I really like the idea to separate well tested modules from experimentals. I loose lots of time each time testing every module before finding the good one. Today, I struggled with spline surface interpolation, some grass 6 modules do run out of memory after 3 hours computing, some saga modules run with error, but data is quickly generated, some others run fast and right. This raise the question of unit tests, and maybe of a vote/rating system. Do we have that for processing modules? Régis
-- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Processing-module-duplications-tp5147361p5147384.html Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
