Il 23/06/2014 19:18, Victor Olaya ha scritto: > Paolo, that sounds good to me > > The basic and experimental modules that you propose are the current > simplified and > advanced modes. We should work on a normal mode. > > Let's discuss it here and maybe create a spreadsheet that we can edit to > select the > list of modules to include
maybe we could add tags to modules, much easier to maintain than a separate spreadsheet? first of all, however, I think we should agree on criteria for the inclusion in each category; IMHO normal should be: * well tested (ideally, modules without a test should not be included here, so we can always guarantee normal modules are working properly) * non duplicated (never have two modules doing exactly the same thing; choose the faster and more reliable * with a reasonable set of options, avoiding esoteric stuff (this may be the most difficult choice). Anything more? All the best, and thanks for picking this up. -- Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu Corsi QGIS e PostGIS: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
