Paolo, I'm not sure I fully understand the proposal. Do you mean to show the "basic", "normal" and "advanced" groups in the GUI? I'm not sure it's something a user will understand easily. What is a "normal" algorithm? I understand your meaning, but I fear it's not stragthforward, and it doesn't seeme to be the first criteria a user would look for. Probably I misudnerstood you...
giovanni 2014-06-24 9:15 GMT+02:00 Paolo Cavallini <[email protected]>: > Il 23/06/2014 19:18, Victor Olaya ha scritto: > > Paolo, that sounds good to me > > > > The basic and experimental modules that you propose are the current > simplified and > > advanced modes. We should work on a normal mode. > > > > Let's discuss it here and maybe create a spreadsheet that we can edit to > select the > > list of modules to include > > maybe we could add tags to modules, much easier to maintain than a > separate spreadsheet? > first of all, however, I think we should agree on criteria for the > inclusion in each > category; IMHO normal should be: > * well tested (ideally, modules without a test should not be included > here, so we can > always guarantee normal modules are working properly) > * non duplicated (never have two modules doing exactly the same thing; > choose the > faster and more reliable > * with a reasonable set of options, avoiding esoteric stuff (this may be > the most > difficult choice). > Anything more? > All the best, and thanks for picking this up. > -- > Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu > Corsi QGIS e PostGIS: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > -- Giovanni Allegri http://about.me/giovanniallegri Twitter: https://twitter.com/_giohappy_ blog: http://blog.spaziogis.it GEO+ geomatica in Italia http://bit.ly/GEOplus
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
