+1 for QEP from me, I really like the idea of an unique and personal tag. All the Best, -SL
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Alexander Bruy <[email protected]> wrote: > +0 for QEP from me > > 2014-09-02 16:01 GMT+03:00 Larry Shaffer <[email protected]>: >> Hi, >> >> I need to start using the new QEP/RFC setup (today actually), specifically >> for some sponsored work. I don't want the sponsor to think the QGIS project >> is indecisive, so I propose a vote on the naming of the process, since there >> is some disagreement. >> >> QEP or RFC? >> >> +0 for QEP (I'm fine with RFC, as well). >> >> I think RFC is a bit dry, though universally understood. QEP should not >> confuse the public, since the dev group actually interested in using them is >> fairly small. QEP is clearly spelled out in the repo name. QEP shows a >> renewed configuration over the older, existing RFC process. >> >> Lastly, QEP pays homage to Python's PEP. I think QGIS would not be as >> popular as it is today if it were not for Python integration. >> >> Regards, >> >> Larry Shaffer >> Dakota Cartography >> Black Hills, South Dakota >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Qgis-developer mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > > > > -- > Alexander Bruy > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer -- Salvatore Larosa linkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/larosasalvatore twitter: @lrssvt skype: s.larosa IRC: lrssvt on freenode _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
