+1 for QEP Martin
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 8:01 PM, Larry Shaffer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I need to start using the new QEP/RFC setup (today actually), specifically > for some sponsored work. I don't want the sponsor to think the QGIS project > is indecisive, so I propose a vote on the naming of the process, since there > is some disagreement. > > QEP or RFC? > > +0 for QEP (I'm fine with RFC, as well). > > I think RFC is a bit dry, though universally understood. QEP should not > confuse the public, since the dev group actually interested in using them is > fairly small. QEP is clearly spelled out in the repo name. QEP shows a > renewed configuration over the older, existing RFC process. > > Lastly, QEP pays homage to Python's PEP. I think QGIS would not be as > popular as it is today if it were not for Python integration. > > Regards, > > Larry Shaffer > Dakota Cartography > Black Hills, South Dakota > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
