Hi, I was more in favor of RFC at the beginning, but QEP will ease search on search engine.
So +1 for QEP. Vincent Le mercredi 3 septembre 2014 03:56:48, Martin Dobias a écrit : > +1 for QEP > > Martin > > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 8:01 PM, Larry Shaffer <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I need to start using the new QEP/RFC setup (today actually), > > specifically for some sponsored work. I don't want the sponsor to think > > the QGIS project is indecisive, so I propose a vote on the naming of the > > process, since there is some disagreement. > > > > QEP or RFC? > > > > +0 for QEP (I'm fine with RFC, as well). > > > > I think RFC is a bit dry, though universally understood. QEP should not > > confuse the public, since the dev group actually interested in using them > > is fairly small. QEP is clearly spelled out in the repo name. QEP shows > > a renewed configuration over the older, existing RFC process. > > > > Lastly, QEP pays homage to Python's PEP. I think QGIS would not be as > > popular as it is today if it were not for Python integration. > > > > Regards, > > > > Larry Shaffer > > Dakota Cartography > > Black Hills, South Dakota > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Qgis-developer mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
