On 24-09-14 10:56, Denis Rouzaud wrote: > So, the bottom line, any objection to changing the behaviour of: > * edit node tool > * move feature > * rotate feature > * move label > * rotate label > * any other press-pan-release map tool that I am not aware of > ???
Hi Denis, though I'm not a hard core digitizer/edittool user, I think removing inconsistency is always good! But I would really wait for some input of a hardcore editing user. What about writing per tool, the behaviour you propose in a QEP (https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals) so we can discuss it there? One thing that I cannot fit in your proposal is how to do the multiple selection of features (eg used for rotating and moving a group of features). If you have one tool for both selecting features and dragging/rotating them, when does the tool 'know' when you finished selecting and start doing the action? (trying to answer myself: using the ctrl and/or shift key??). You also miss the different selection options... OR you make the selection via the selection tool optional: so for one feature the 'selecting' is via a click, for a set of features you go via the normal selection tool? Last thing: when moving (a set of features) without really 'dragging', is the 'dragging' visible in your proposal? Or can you only see the displacement/move after the second click. I hope I can preview stuff during my action, but I cannot fit that in your view of being able to do other things then. Shorter version: as long as you make it more consistent and usable: go :-) Regards, Richard Duivenvoorde _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
