On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Nathan Woodrow <[email protected]> wrote: > Personally I think we should still do 2.8, LTR it, and then we can do 3.0 > for the next release.
I agree with a LTS version (what's LTR??? :-) ). It should be important that the 2.X will not be "abbandoned" like as the last 1.X series (1.8), with the Postgres primary key bug that remained UNFIXED and that version was pretty useless... _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
