Yes, 2.8 LTR is the least we need to do for users that spent time to update to 2.0.
Matthias On 08.11.2014 12:27, Anita Graser wrote: > On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Nathan Woodrow <[email protected]> wrote: >> Personally I think we should still do 2.8, LTR it, and then we can do 3.0 >> for the next release. >> >> Breaking the API again without a LTR in place makes me nervous as the 2.0 >> API really wasn't that long ago. > > +1 and even without officially breaking the API, plugin devs have been > quite busy with other changes which kept breaking plugins such as > multi-threaded rendering. > > > Best wishes, > Anita > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer -- Help getting QGIS to the next level of quality before November 15! http://blog.vitu.ch/10102014-1046/crowdfunding-initiative-automated-testing _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
