**If I may** +1 for LTS or LTR
Il 08/11/2014 15.09, G. Allegri ha scritto:
+1 for LTS (2.6 or 2.8?).
A new API break risks to make users (and plugin developers) quite nervous!
IMHO as an user myself i think that a working tool is more valuable than
a new tool,
E.G. the coming QEP from Nyall (about Composer refactoring) breaks
Composer gui API, while it should mantain core. This could be included
in an LTS release, while in QGIS 3.0 back compatibility can be discarded.
Just a question: typically an LTS brings backport updates during its
lifetime. In case of QGIS how would this happen? Will we provideca new
packaging for that release with a scheduling following the master release?
always **if i can** and**IMHO** an LTS should be a tool that you know
you can relay on
with known and expected behavior so no new feature only bugfix or
critical bugfix
Best regards, and thanks for your great work,
Roy.
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
