On 13 October 2015 at 09:15, Nyall Dawson <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12 October 2015 at 22:47, Andreas Neumann <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi all, > >> >> So should we really keep this fast release cycle with releases every 4 >> months with the risk that these in between releases are barely usable for >> professional users or should we rather have one release every 6 to 12 months >> and invest more (financial) resources into these fewer releases? I would >> personally vote for fewer releases and increased QA resources. Maybe change >> to a release every 6 months with four months of development and 2 months of >> bug fixing/testing - and see how this works? > > My thoughts (note that I'm not in a position where I have to maintain > an enterprise-wide rollout, so my viewpoint may be skewed): > > - If you're using QGIS in a professional setting, you SHOULD be using > 2.8 ONLY. I wouldn't recommend non-LTR releases as suitable in any way > for professional use. Treat the non LTR releases as betas or for hobby > use only.
Just to clarify - I don't mean that we (as a project) should treat these releases as a beta, just that corporate end users should... Nyall _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
