On 09-02-16 01:01, Nyall Dawson wrote: > > On 9 Feb 2016 10:36 AM, "Larry Shaffer" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> How about this: >> >> * Release 2.14 as an LTR (on schedule), but with the option of having > new, heavily unit-tested and vetted features still available for pushing >> * Skip a 2.16 release >> * Release 3.0 version 8 months after 2.14 >> >> This would allow cleaning up of the PRs and QEPs that apply to the 2.x > branch, but not tie up the overall dev community with another full 2.x > point release. There will be 2.14.x releases, but possibly with an > understanding of when new features were introduced, e.g. tags >= 2.14.x > have new features. >> >> It would also offer a full 8 months of work on porting everything to > 2.x to 3.0, and allow the community to be well informed ahead of the > impending change. >> >> Please keep in mind, for the Mac user community, the sooner a 3.0 beta > release is available the better, as Qt4 has very fragile support for > building on the current OS version and may not build at all on future ones. > > Larry - check the PSC list. The plan's been announced there.
To be exact: there is/was a draft plan there, which will be spread wider very soon. But have a look if you are curious :-) Regards, Richard _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
