I like the [WIP] announces as well, a great way for a power user to follow along development. Well done.

-jeff



On 2016-03-14 10:09 PM, Nathan Woodrow wrote:
+1 to using WIP


On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:56 am Nyall Dawson <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    On 11 March 2016 at 21:52, Marco Hugentobler
    <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
     > On 11.03.2016 11:42, Nathan Woodrow wrote:
     >
     > Hi,
     >
     > Cool.  Yeah it's a tricky one.  I guess the QEPs help there for
    the massive
     > stuff, but yeah even then it's tricky.
     >
     > Maybe we just tag mails with [FEATURE] like PRs then we can
    search then out?
     >
     >
     > +1. There is a lot of traffic on the list, so a [FEATURE] - tag will
     > certainly help.

    Any objections to making this "[WIP]" instead? It's possible that work
    includes refactoring or fixes which aren't new features.

    I'll get this started by announcing all the stuff I've got in the
    pipeline. Hope I'm not out of line by using WIP here :)

    Nyall


     >
     > Marco
     >
     >
     >
     > - Nathan
     >
     > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Neumann, Andreas
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
     > wrote:
     >>
     >> Hi Nathan,
     >>
     >> There wasn't any list. The list was just a proposal.
     >>
     >> The list would have the advantage that one could have a good
    overview
     >> without having to dig through the e-mail archive. Imagine you, as a
     >> developer or a customer of a developer, are absent 2-3 weeks. In
    that case
     >> you probably don't read all mails in the dev mailing list and
    such a list
     >> would be convenient.
     >>
     >> But it was decided that a simple announcement on the mailinglist
    is good
     >> enough (less bureaucracy). It is still recorded in the
    mailing-list archive.
     >> If the subject of the mail would have a meaningful or maybe even
     >> standardized title, it would be easy to find.
     >>
     >> Or maybe: if the subject of the mail is standardized, such a
    list could
     >> even be generated automatically ;-)
     >>
     >> Andreas
     >>
     >> On 2016-03-11 11:26, Nathan Woodrow wrote:
     >>
     >> Hi Marco,
     >>
     >> Good to hear.  I wasn't even aware there was a list?  Was it
    published
     >> some place?
     >>
     >> Regards,
     >> Nathan
     >>
     >> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 8:14 PM, Marco Hugentobler
     >> <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
     >>>
     >>> Der developers
     >>>
     >>> During the last PSC meeting
     >>>
    
(https://docs.google.com/document/d/1arzcgoU0NErm8yiqDvCeasFUdr9zt-8JUx15f3ivTdw/edit?pref=2&pli=1),
     >>> Andreas brought up the topic how to improve coordination
    between developers,
     >>> avoiding two devs doing the same thing at the same time. After
    a short
     >>> discussion, the PSC decided not to maintain a list with ongoing
    projects.
     >>> Instead, developers should write a QEP for larger changes. For
    smaller
     >>> changes, do as in the 'good old days': write a short mail to
    the developer
     >>> mailing list to announce your plans.
     >>>
     >>> Regards,
     >>> Marco
     >>>
     >>> --
     >>> Dr. Marco Hugentobler
     >>> Sourcepole -  Linux & Open Source Solutions
     >>> Weberstrasse 5, CH-8004 Zürich, Switzerland
     >>> [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]> http://www.sourcepole.ch
     >>> Technical Advisor QGIS Project Steering Committee
     >>>
     >>> _______________________________________________
     >>> Qgis-developer mailing list
     >>> [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
     >>> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
     >>> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
     >>
     >>
     >> _______________________________________________
     >> Qgis-developer mailing list
     >> [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
     >> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
     >> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
     >>
     >>
     >>
     >>
     >
     >
     >
     >
     > --
     > Dr. Marco Hugentobler
     > Sourcepole -  Linux & Open Source Solutions
     > Weberstrasse 5, CH-8004 Zürich, Switzerland
     > [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]> http://www.sourcepole.ch
     > Technical Advisor QGIS Project Steering Committee
     >
     >


--
Jeff McKenna
MapServer Consulting and Training Services
http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[email protected]
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Reply via email to