On 04/29/2016 05:16 PM, Paolo Cavallini wrote: > Il 29/04/2016 17:06, Jürgen E. Fischer ha scritto: > >> If we had a usable qgis.dtd, that should have been changed long ago. >> >> But as we don't there's not much point in changing the dead link to something >> else that just fails for a different reason. > > IMVHO a page explaining why the dtd is not available is better than a 404. > All the best.
Why don't we remove the link from the files? _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
