Hi Luigi On 04/29/2016 05:32 PM, Luigi Pirelli wrote: > IMHO would make sense to have, soon or later a DTD for project and QML > (expecially QML)... otherwise we are reduce interoperability.
Do you have something specific in mind? > > we can remove it now, because it is not a reliable document... but > IMHO we would focus resources on that. I'm not sure how we would actually maintain a dtd (or xsd) with as little overhead as possible. Do you have ideas? Matthias _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
