IMHO would make sense to have, soon or later a DTD for project and QML (expecially QML)... otherwise we are reduce interoperability.
we can remove it now, because it is not a reliable document... but IMHO we would focus resources on that. Luigi Pirelli ************************************************************************************************** * Boundless QGIS Support/Development: lpirelli AT boundlessgeo DOT com * LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/luigipirelli * Stackexchange: http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/19667/luigi-pirelli * GitHub: https://github.com/luipir * Mastering QGIS: https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/mastering-qgis ************************************************************************************************** On 29 April 2016 at 17:21, Matthias Kuhn <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04/29/2016 05:16 PM, Paolo Cavallini wrote: >> Il 29/04/2016 17:06, Jürgen E. Fischer ha scritto: >> >>> If we had a usable qgis.dtd, that should have been changed long ago. >>> >>> But as we don't there's not much point in changing the dead link to >>> something >>> else that just fails for a different reason. >> >> IMVHO a page explaining why the dtd is not available is better than a 404. >> All the best. > > Why don't we remove the link from the files? > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
