On 09/14/2016 09:02 AM, Matthias Kuhn wrote: > On 09/14/2016 08:46 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> On 09/14/2016 08:26 AM, Matthias Kuhn wrote: >>> QtWebKit is not removed, is it? >> >> Not yet, but will be (in Debian) since there is no more upstream >> security support for WebKit in Qt4 now that it's EOL. Continuing to rely >> on WebKit in Qt4 is irresponsible from a security POV. > > We will be switching to Qt5 soon, this discussion only targets the Qt5 > version, so this is no issue.
For Qt5 it's no problem, that's still supported upstream. I thought you meant like the embedded copy of python-qt4. > In the meanwhile it would be nice if QGIS users wouldn't be forced to > switch to other distributions. It would be great if QGIS were to support changes in its dependencies sooner, and not wait until they are (near) EOL. I guess the incentive isn't there when there is no funding for it. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
