On 09/14/2016 09:13 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 09/14/2016 09:02 AM, Matthias Kuhn wrote: >> On 09/14/2016 08:46 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>> On 09/14/2016 08:26 AM, Matthias Kuhn wrote: >>>> QtWebKit is not removed, is it? >>> >>> Not yet, but will be (in Debian) since there is no more upstream >>> security support for WebKit in Qt4 now that it's EOL. Continuing to rely >>> on WebKit in Qt4 is irresponsible from a security POV. >> >> We will be switching to Qt5 soon, this discussion only targets the Qt5 >> version, so this is no issue. > > For Qt5 it's no problem, that's still supported upstream. > > I thought you meant like the embedded copy of python-qt4. > >> In the meanwhile it would be nice if QGIS users wouldn't be forced to >> switch to other distributions. > > It would be great if QGIS were to support changes in its dependencies > sooner, and not wait until they are (near) EOL. I guess the incentive > isn't there when there is no funding for it.
I've started working on Qt5 transitions without any funding way more than a year ago. Regards, Matthias _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
