On 14 September 2016 at 17:13, Sebastiaan Couwenberg <[email protected]> wrote: > On 09/14/2016 09:02 AM, Matthias Kuhn wrote: >> On 09/14/2016 08:46 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>> On 09/14/2016 08:26 AM, Matthias Kuhn wrote: >>>> QtWebKit is not removed, is it? >>> >>> Not yet, but will be (in Debian) since there is no more upstream >>> security support for WebKit in Qt4 now that it's EOL. Continuing to rely >>> on WebKit in Qt4 is irresponsible from a security POV. >> >> We will be switching to Qt5 soon, this discussion only targets the Qt5 >> version, so this is no issue. > > For Qt5 it's no problem, that's still supported upstream.
Ah - maybe I've got this wrong. I thought it was getting cut off with 5.6. So that's good news, I guess we can stick with QtWebKit for the life of QGIS 3. and hope the situation is better when 4 rolls around.... > It would be great if QGIS were to support changes in its dependencies > sooner, and not wait until they are (near) EOL. I guess the incentive > isn't there when there is no funding for it. More like we're all totally swamped and exhausted as it is ;) Nyall > > Kind Regards, > > Bas > > -- > GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 > Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
