Hello, As soon as we release the 2.18 we can start translation until the QGIS 3.0 release. So that's let some time for translator to work on this.
Mathias is right: we can't handle two release atthe same time. About backport manager, yes it is not worth to have one if every documenter do its backport. Y. Le dimanche 5 mars 2017, 00:53:53 CET Alexandre Neto a écrit : > Hi Mathias, > > We only need to translate finished documentation. So I guess the next > candidate for translation would be 2.18 Documentation once it was released. > > Richard is the guy that have it all wired up, I would like to hear from him > if there are any nasty implications of having two branches receiving > changes. > > A sáb, 4/03/2017, 23:05, Matthias Kuhn <[email protected]> escreveu: > > Hi all, > > > > Are there any specific plans how to handle translations? > > > > I don't think transifex can handle multiple branches (please proof me > > wrong!). So I guess a decision needs to be made from which branch > > updates should be pushed to transifex. Possibly the translated files can > > then be pulled into the other branch as well, but that sounds like > > advanced magic and a good portion of luck ;) > > > > Matthias > > _______________________________________________ > > Qgis-developer mailing list > > [email protected] > > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
