A quick, sweeping, unhelpful but important opinion from me (non-dev, non-doc-writer).
Please don't think that retrospective documentation, and lack of docs for current release (not master, but current non-LTR release) is good, just because that's how it is now. This is the *biggest* failing of the QGIS project when stacked up against commercial alternatives. Can you imagine a professional software package being released without full docs? I know that we just don't have the resources to improve this to where it should be, but perhaps this would be an argument to slow down the release cycle. To make it absolutely clear: that fact that current latest release of QGIS doesn't have docs is a huge failure. </tuppence> ----- Buy Pie Spy: Adventures in British pastry 2010-11 on Amazon -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/3-0-Documentation-and-branching-tp5306770p5310924.html Sent from the QGIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
