On 14 February 2018 at 23:35, Jürgen E. Fischer <j...@norbit.de> wrote:
> Hi Nyall,
> On Wed, 14. Feb 2018 at 21:43:35 +1100, Nyall Dawson wrote:
>> The point releases we should probably time just after our monthly release so
>> that the upgrade gets a full month of testing and there's plenty of time to
>> rollback if necessary. Bring on the upgrades I say!
> With point releases I was refering to our monthly release.  I don't plan to do
> any Qt updates unless we require them for new stuff (like 3D; which triggered
> the update from 5.7 to 5.9).
> But if we update I'd do them with one of our point releases so that the new
> release is build with then available Qt - the next nightlies would also pick
> them up.  Otherwise we'd have the release packages using a newer Qt then the
> one they were built with.

That's all fair enough. Does your no-upgrade plan include Qt bug fix
releases? E.g. 5.9.4?

(Please understand I'm not asking you to do work here... I just want
to fully understand the plans).

QGIS-Developer mailing list
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Reply via email to