+1 to end 3.4 cycle a few months early too. On Thu, Nov 28, 2019, 05:57 Nathan Woodrow <madman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 on dropping support early as the risk is large on breaking the users > experience with a LTR > > On Thu., 28 Nov. 2019, 8:55 am Even Rouault, <even.roua...@spatialys.com> > wrote: > >> > I think the issues are deeper then the crashes/projection failures >> > fixed by the GDAL/proj cherry-picked commits. >> >> Yes, actually QGIS 3.4 should not be affected by the PROJ fix, because >> it >> uses the old pj_transform() API with doesn't trigger that code path at >> all. >> But it *is* affected by exportToProj4() no longer returning +datum or >> +towgs84 >> in cases where it used to be, which basically makes working with anything >> != >> WGS 84 fundamentaly broken. The only "fix" would be to backport the fully >> fledged PROJ 6 support of 3.10 which is obviously unreasonable to do in >> 3.4 >> >> > think we SHOULD drop >> > Windows LTR support early rather than releasing a 3.4 build based on >> > proj6/gdal3. >> >> +1 >> >> -- >> Spatialys - Geospatial professional services >> http://www.spatialys.com >> _______________________________________________ >> QGIS-Developer mailing list >> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org >> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
