I think the QGIS twitter account already mentioned that the 3.10.2 installer had been retired due to issues and re-build.
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 5:07 PM DelazJ <del...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Thanks Mathieu. Should it be 3.10.2 or 3.10.3? Asking because those who > have already downloaded the broken 3.10.2 may not think to update. > > Regards, > Harrissou > > Le mer. 22 janv. 2020 à 11:05, Mathieu Pellerin <nirvn.a...@gmail.com> a > écrit : > >> Matthias, >> >> Good idea. >> >> Math >> >> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 5:02 PM Matthias Kuhn <matth...@opengis.ch> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Mathieu, >>> >>> Thanks a lot. It reads very well! >>> >>> Something that I'd like to add is that in case of still finding a bug, >>> users should file issues and to mention proximity of LTR replacement. >>> If you still happen to find QGIS behaving in an unexpected way, please >>> let us know on https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues >>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues&sa=D&source=hangouts&ust=1579773605204000&usg=AFQjCNHP21SO7MPYwrn023vHOeZwMUBKuQ> >>> as always. We are very happy that QGIS 3.10 is now in shape to replace 3.4 >>> as LTR in a month time. >>> >>> Bests >>> Matthias >>> >>> >>> On 1/22/20 10:58 AM, Mathieu Pellerin wrote: >>> >>> Paolo, here's the draft blog post: >>> >>> *Public Service Announcement: Update to the latest point release now* >>> ------ >>> QGIS users who have adopted the 3.10 version when initially released at >>> the end of October 2019 have likely noticed a sharp drop in reliability. >>> The underlying issues have now been addressed in 3.10.2, all users are >>> advised to update *now*. >>> >>> When QGIS 3.10 was first released in the end of October 2019, a pair of >>> libraries – namely GDAL and PROJ – were updated to their next-generation >>> versions. The advantages are plenty: GeoPDF export[1] support, more >>> accurate coordinate transformation, etc. For those interested, more >>> technical information on this is available here[2]. >>> >>> The update of these crucial libraries led to a number of regressions. >>> While we expected some issues to arise, the seriousness of the disruption >>> caught us off guard. Yet, it was also somewhat inevitable: QGIS is the >>> first large GIS project to expose these next-generation libraries to the >>> masses. The large number of QGIS users across the globe were essentially >>> stress testing both new code within QGIS as well as the libraries >>> themselves. >>> >>> Thanks to dedicated users taking time to file in report and the >>> community helping out as well as our project sponsors for allowing us to >>> fund development time, developers have been able to fix all known >>> regressions in both in QGIS as well as underlying GDAL and PROJ libraries, >>> benefiting a large number of open source projects. >>> >>> As a result of this collective effort by the community, QGIS 3.10.2 is >>> now back to being the reliable and stable GIS software we all love. As >>> such, we cannot stress enough the important of updating now. >>> >>> Once again, thanks to our community of testers, sponsors, and developers >>> for their countless hours and efforts in making QGIS better. >>> >>> Happy mapping! >>> >>> [1] https://north-road.com/2019/09/03/qgis-3-10-loves-geopdf/ >>> [2] https://gdalbarn.com/ >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 9:56 AM Paolo Cavallini <cavall...@faunalia.it> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Fully agreed. Mathieu, would you like to write it? >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> On 21 January 2020 06:39:08 GMT+04:00, Mathieu Pellerin < >>>> nirvn.a...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +100 on all that's been said here. >>>>> >>>>> Also, once 3.10.2 is updated to include the updated packages & >>>>> above-referred fix, I'd suggest writing a QGIS.org blog post to inform >>>>> users of the worthiness of updating to 3.10.2(.2) *ASAP*, and expand a bit >>>>> on why 3.10.0/.1 were such rough releases. We can finish the post by >>>>> thanking users that have reported bugs (an inevitable nightmare to go >>>>> through as QGIS was exposing brand new GDAL3/PROJ6 versions to the >>>>> masses). >>>>> IMHO, we should not skip this communication to our users. >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 7:27 AM Nyall Dawson <nyall.daw...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Also, we better wait for a fix for >>>>>> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/33902 (incoming)... >>>>>> >>>>>> Gosh, will the nightmare ever end... Let's agree never to change >>>>>> anything in gdal or proj or qgis ever again ;) >>>>>> >>>>>> Nyall >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>>>>> From: Nyall Dawson <nyall.daw...@gmail.com> >>>>>> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 at 06:28 >>>>>> Subject: Urgent: Remove windows 3.10.2 installer from site >>>>>> To: qgis-developer <qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Can we please remove the 3.10.2 installer from the website as a matter >>>>>> of urgency? This installer was released using the older gdal 3.0.2 and >>>>>> proj 6.2 versions, which directly lead to crashes and reprojection >>>>>> failures in QGIS. >>>>>> >>>>>> QGIS ********************SHOULD NEVER EVER*********************** be >>>>>> used with gdal >= 3 and gdal < 3.0.3 or proj >6 and proj < 6.3.0. >>>>>> >>>>>> This combination is a world of hurt for users :( >>>>>> >>>>>> Tickets filed at https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo4w/ticket/618, and >>>>>> https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo4w/ticket/617, and later today I'm going >>>>>> to commit cmake blocks which will completely prevent compilation under >>>>>> the affected gdal/proj versions. >>>>>> >>>>>> Nyall >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> QGIS-Developer mailing list >>>>>> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org >>>>>> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >>>>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> Please excuse my brevity. >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> QGIS-Developer mailing listqgis-develo...@lists.osgeo.org >>> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >> QGIS-Developer mailing list >> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org >> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > >
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer