Fantastic, thank you. On Fri, Jan 24, 2020, 15:48 Anita Graser <[email protected]> wrote:
> I can do it. > > Regards, > Anita > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 12:15 AM Mathieu Pellerin <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Jürgen, thanks for the successful re-release of 3.10.2. >> >> Paolo, Anita, who is in a position to publish the drafted post on the >> blog? >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020, 10:59 Mathieu Pellerin <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 to that plan. We're 33% done already since the blocking PR has been >>> merged. >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 6:47 PM Matthias Kuhn <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> How about >>>> >>>> - Waiting for https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/33971 >>>> >>>> - Releasing 3.10.3 >>>> >>>> - Announce on twitter, blog, news panel >>>> >>>> Clear cut for everyone (including those 95% of our users not following >>>> [qgis on] twitter) >>>> >>>> Matthias >>>> On 1/22/20 12:39 PM, Anita Graser wrote: >>>> >>>> Is it time to send an update on Twitter yet? I don't see new installers >>>> at https://qgis.org/downloads/ >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Anita >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 11:08 AM Mathieu Pellerin <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I think the QGIS twitter account already mentioned that the 3.10.2 >>>>> installer had been retired due to issues and re-build. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 5:07 PM DelazJ <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks Mathieu. Should it be 3.10.2 or 3.10.3? Asking because those >>>>>> who have already downloaded the broken 3.10.2 may not think to update. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Harrissou >>>>>> >>>>>> Le mer. 22 janv. 2020 à 11:05, Mathieu Pellerin <[email protected]> >>>>>> a écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>>> Matthias, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Good idea. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Math >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 5:02 PM Matthias Kuhn <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Mathieu, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks a lot. It reads very well! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Something that I'd like to add is that in case of still finding a >>>>>>>> bug, users should file issues and to mention proximity of LTR >>>>>>>> replacement. >>>>>>>> If you still happen to find QGIS behaving in an unexpected way, >>>>>>>> please let us know on https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues >>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues&sa=D&source=hangouts&ust=1579773605204000&usg=AFQjCNHP21SO7MPYwrn023vHOeZwMUBKuQ> >>>>>>>> as always. We are very happy that QGIS 3.10 is now in shape to replace >>>>>>>> 3.4 >>>>>>>> as LTR in a month time. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bests >>>>>>>> Matthias >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 1/22/20 10:58 AM, Mathieu Pellerin wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Paolo, here's the draft blog post: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Public Service Announcement: Update to the latest point release >>>>>>>> now* >>>>>>>> ------ >>>>>>>> QGIS users who have adopted the 3.10 version when initially >>>>>>>> released at the end of October 2019 have likely noticed a sharp drop in >>>>>>>> reliability. The underlying issues have now been addressed in 3.10.2, >>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>> users are advised to update *now*. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> When QGIS 3.10 was first released in the end of October 2019, a >>>>>>>> pair of libraries – namely GDAL and PROJ – were updated to their >>>>>>>> next-generation versions. The advantages are plenty: GeoPDF export[1] >>>>>>>> support, more accurate coordinate transformation, etc. For those >>>>>>>> interested, more technical information on this is available here[2]. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The update of these crucial libraries led to a number of >>>>>>>> regressions. While we expected some issues to arise, the seriousness >>>>>>>> of the >>>>>>>> disruption caught us off guard. Yet, it was also somewhat inevitable: >>>>>>>> QGIS >>>>>>>> is the first large GIS project to expose these next-generation >>>>>>>> libraries to >>>>>>>> the masses. The large number of QGIS users across the globe were >>>>>>>> essentially stress testing both new code within QGIS as well as the >>>>>>>> libraries themselves. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks to dedicated users taking time to file in report and the >>>>>>>> community helping out as well as our project sponsors for allowing us >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> fund development time, developers have been able to fix all known >>>>>>>> regressions in both in QGIS as well as underlying GDAL and PROJ >>>>>>>> libraries, >>>>>>>> benefiting a large number of open source projects. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As a result of this collective effort by the community, QGIS 3.10.2 >>>>>>>> is now back to being the reliable and stable GIS software we all love. >>>>>>>> As >>>>>>>> such, we cannot stress enough the important of updating now. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Once again, thanks to our community of testers, sponsors, and >>>>>>>> developers for their countless hours and efforts in making QGIS better. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Happy mapping! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [1] https://north-road.com/2019/09/03/qgis-3-10-loves-geopdf/ >>>>>>>> [2] https://gdalbarn.com/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 9:56 AM Paolo Cavallini < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Fully agreed. Mathieu, would you like to write it? >>>>>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 21 January 2020 06:39:08 GMT+04:00, Mathieu Pellerin < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +100 on all that's been said here. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Also, once 3.10.2 is updated to include the updated packages & >>>>>>>>>> above-referred fix, I'd suggest writing a QGIS.org blog post to >>>>>>>>>> inform >>>>>>>>>> users of the worthiness of updating to 3.10.2(.2) *ASAP*, and expand >>>>>>>>>> a bit >>>>>>>>>> on why 3.10.0/.1 were such rough releases. We can finish the post by >>>>>>>>>> thanking users that have reported bugs (an inevitable nightmare to go >>>>>>>>>> through as QGIS was exposing brand new GDAL3/PROJ6 versions to the >>>>>>>>>> masses). >>>>>>>>>> IMHO, we should not skip this communication to our users. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 7:27 AM Nyall Dawson < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Also, we better wait for a fix for >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/33902 (incoming)... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Gosh, will the nightmare ever end... Let's agree never to change >>>>>>>>>>> anything in gdal or proj or qgis ever again ;) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Nyall >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>>>>>>>>>> From: Nyall Dawson <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 at 06:28 >>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Urgent: Remove windows 3.10.2 installer from site >>>>>>>>>>> To: qgis-developer <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Can we please remove the 3.10.2 installer from the website as a >>>>>>>>>>> matter >>>>>>>>>>> of urgency? This installer was released using the older gdal >>>>>>>>>>> 3.0.2 and >>>>>>>>>>> proj 6.2 versions, which directly lead to crashes and >>>>>>>>>>> reprojection >>>>>>>>>>> failures in QGIS. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> QGIS ********************SHOULD NEVER >>>>>>>>>>> EVER*********************** be >>>>>>>>>>> used with gdal >= 3 and gdal < 3.0.3 or proj >6 and proj < 6.3.0. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> This combination is a world of hurt for users :( >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Tickets filed at https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo4w/ticket/618, and >>>>>>>>>>> https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo4w/ticket/617, and later today I'm >>>>>>>>>>> going >>>>>>>>>>> to commit cmake blocks which will completely prevent compilation >>>>>>>>>>> under >>>>>>>>>>> the affected gdal/proj versions. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Nyall >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> QGIS-Developer mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>> List info: >>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >>>>>>>>>>> Unsubscribe: >>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Please excuse my brevity. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> QGIS-Developer mailing [email protected] >>>>>>>> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >>>>>>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> QGIS-Developer mailing list >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >>>>>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> QGIS-Developer mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >>>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> QGIS-Developer mailing [email protected] >>>> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >> QGIS-Developer mailing list >> [email protected] >> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > >
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
