Nyall Dawson via QGIS-Developer <[email protected]> writes:
> I noticed a lot of bug fixes aren't getting the 3.44 backport label. > Is this an intentional decision now? Are we at the stage where we > should be limiting 3.44 backports to critical fixes only? 1) Have we annnounced: 4.0.2 is the standard approach. If you haven't upgraded from 3.44.x to 4.0.2, you're behind. In other words, when someone say "I want to run qgis but I don't know what version - tell me", what do we say? 2) Have we blessed a new LTR? Unless the answers are reliably "x, where x is newer than 3.44" and "yes", then I think it makes sense to maintain 3.44.x. For getting work done, I'm using 3.44.x. I'm pretty sure most people would advise to use that. So I think the answers to 1/2 are "no, and 3.44 is still what people should run" _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
