Nyall Dawson <[email protected]> writes: > On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 at 11:22, Greg Troxel via QGIS-Developer < > [email protected]> wrote: >> >> Nyall Dawson via QGIS-Developer <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > I noticed a lot of bug fixes aren't getting the 3.44 backport label. >> > Is this an intentional decision now? Are we at the stage where we >> > should be limiting 3.44 backports to critical fixes only? >> >> 1) Have we annnounced: 4.0.2 is the standard approach. If you haven't >> upgraded from 3.44.x to 4.0.2, you're behind. In other words, when >> someone say "I want to run qgis but I don't know what version - tell >> me", what do we say? > > No, we very strongly say "stick with 3.44"!
I thought so. Then IMHO anything that's a bugfix should be getting backported. (Up-to-date, following guidance) users are on 3.44. >> 2) Have we blessed a new LTR? > > No. (And I would suggest we DON'T tag 4.2 as LTR... but that's a completely > different discussion 😜 ) Indeed. I guess we should defer that until 4.2.0 is out and we are about to tag 4.2.1, as I understand it. A lot can happen between now and then. _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
