On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 at 11:22, Greg Troxel via QGIS-Developer < [email protected]> wrote: > > Nyall Dawson via QGIS-Developer <[email protected]> writes: > > > I noticed a lot of bug fixes aren't getting the 3.44 backport label. > > Is this an intentional decision now? Are we at the stage where we > > should be limiting 3.44 backports to critical fixes only? > > 1) Have we annnounced: 4.0.2 is the standard approach. If you haven't > upgraded from 3.44.x to 4.0.2, you're behind. In other words, when > someone say "I want to run qgis but I don't know what version - tell > me", what do we say?
No, we very strongly say "stick with 3.44"! > > 2) Have we blessed a new LTR? No. (And I would suggest we DON'T tag 4.2 as LTR... but that's a completely different discussion 😜 ) > > Unless the answers are reliably "x, where x is newer than 3.44" and > "yes", then I think it makes sense to maintain 3.44.x. > > For getting work done, I'm using 3.44.x. I'm pretty sure most people > would advise to use that. So I think the answers to 1/2 are "no, and > 3.44 is still what people should run" > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
