Hi Pirmin what happens if / when QGIS project itself wants to release QGIS Enterprise version - or another company? Maybe it would be better to call it 'Sourcepole GIS' or something to make it clear that it is not an official QGIS product but an official Sourcepole product? I think there is going to be a lot of confusion otherwise with people thinking that it is part of the QGIS project but they can't have it....
Also (out of curiosity) what is to stop one of your clients cloning the private source tree that you provide and then making that publicly available - or just pushing it back in to the mainstream QGIS tree? i.e. do you realise any real long term benefit from keeping the tree private in the first place? Best regards Tim On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Nathan Woodrow <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Yves Jacolin (Free) <[email protected]>wrote: > >> My understanding is that it is a commercial service, so you don't have any >> licence. >> > > No. It's still GPL. > > Any support docs, or training sourcepole provide however are not. Only the > QGIS software bit part > > - Nathan > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user > > -- Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member (Release Manager) ============================================== Please do not email me off-list with technical support questions. Using the lists will gain more exposure for your issues and the knowledge surrounding your issue will be shared with all. Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net ==============================================
_______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
