Hello,
Le vendredi 5 juillet 2013 11:13:47, Werner Macho a écrit : > Hi! > > My suggestion to solve that kind of problems would be to just have a > > "something"|..... based on QGIS +1 for that, clear and efficient. Vincent > > but I appreciate the appearance of the enterprise QGIS and hope that > it will QGIS itself some push to be more known by companies .. > > regards > Werner > > > On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Giuseppe Sucameli > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Pirmin Kalberer <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > >> > Pirmin what happens if / when QGIS project itself wants to release > >> > QGIS Enterprise version - or another company? Maybe it would be > >> > better to call > >> > it 'Sourcepole GIS' or something to make it clear that it is not an > >> > official QGIS product but an official Sourcepole product? > >> > >> I think a completely different name of a "new" GIS which is "very > >> similar" to > >> QGIS could be more confusion than one or many QGIS variants. > > > > I agree with Pirmin, a product with a completely different name sounds > > like a new GIS software. > > In addition, not keeping the relation with the QGIS project may damage > > the project itself in the long run. > > > > Why do not put the company name in the front, something like > > Sourcepole QGIS Cloud/Enterprise? > > This makes everything more clear and allows others companies, but mainly > > the QGIS project itself, to create its own version. > > > > Just my 2 cents. > > > >> > Also (out of curiosity) what is to stop one of your clients cloning > >> > the private source tree that you provide and then making that > >> > publicly available - or just pushing it back in to the mainstream > >> > QGIS tree? i.e. do > >> > you realise any real long term benefit from keeping the tree private > >> > in the > >> > first place? > >> > >> We didn't think a lot about publishing our source code branch, yet. So > >> this > >> could happen anytime. The question why clients do not publish sources of > >> commercial FOSS software is hard to answer. Maybe it's a question of > >> loality? > >> > >> Regards > >> Pirmin > >> > >> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commercial_open_source_applications > >> > >> > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Nathan Woodrow <[email protected]> > >> > > >> > wrote: > >> > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Yves Jacolin (Free) > >> > >> <[email protected]>wrote: > >> > >> My understanding is that it is a commercial service, so you don't > >> > >> have > >> > >> any > >> > >> licence. > >> > > > >> > > No. It's still GPL. > >> > > > >> > > Any support docs, or training sourcepole provide however are not. > >> > > Only the > >> > > QGIS software bit part > >> > > > >> > > - Nathan > >> > > > >> > > _______________________________________________ > >> > > Qgis-user mailing list > >> > > [email protected] > >> > > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user > >> > >> -- > >> Pirmin Kalberer > >> Sourcepole - Linux & Open Source Solutions > >> http://www.sourcepole.com > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Qgis-developer mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > > > > -- > > Giuseppe Sucameli > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Qgis-developer mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user _______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
